Daniel Beardwell
- Total activity 208
- Last activity
- Member since
- Following 5 users
- Followed by 0 users
- Votes 109
- Subscriptions 33
Posts
Recent activity by Daniel Beardwell Sort by recent activity-
Rename "Re-quote" button
Could you rename the "Re-quote" button to "New case with client" The current button is quite misleading. A requote should rerun the existing case as the client to reapply rules and rating, effecti...
-
Set a referral in the rating matrix
I'd like to be able to set a referral in the rating matrix to avoid additional hidden questions.
-
Can I set a referral in the rating?
Is it possible to set a referral in my rating matrix?
-
View and restore deleted cases
It would be ideal if we could see deleted cases and have the option to restore them. 'Deleted' could be a new case status with an Administrator button to restore.
-
How do I use the Formula Sandbox?
I've noticed in the top right corner of the rate builder screen there's a link that says: "To test your new formula, try the Formula Sandbox NEW" This looks like an interesting feature but I have n...
-
How do I check the agent in the matrix?
I understand that it's possible to to check for an agent in the rules, but is it possible to check the agent in the rating?
-
Limits based off questions
It would be hugely useful if question Limits could be set based off other questions. I've attached a mockup of how the limits tab could look. I'm working on a scheme that uses a Trade lookup. The ...
-
Hidden Table Rows
It would be helpful to have the ability to use hidden rows in tables. This would be especially useful in situations where lookups with corresponding columns are used.
-
Protection against deleting Reports
CompletedGood morning all, We have the problems on some of our site where users are able to delete reports that are being used. A simple solution we have thought of would be to add some kind of lock agains...
-
Reports: Scheme "Is Not" condition
CompletedHi guys, The ability to use "Scheme Is not" in report conditions would be useful for certain reports. Is this a feature that could be considered for the near future? ThanksDaniel